Is this science or pseudoscience?
The psychology we stand on — separation–individuation, parental alienation, attachment, emotional blackmail — is mainstream, peer-reviewed work. The link between those mechanisms and specific teeth is our hypothesis: 220+ documented diagnostics, stated falsifiably, open to refutation. The free diagnostic exists precisely so you can test it on the one dataset you fully control — yourself.
Do I still need a dentist?
Yes. Always. Nothing on this page treats a tooth, and no communication work replaces a filling. The dentist restores the enamel; we work with what keeps breaking it.
My incisor is under a veneer or crown — does this still apply?
Yes — arguably more. What matters is the tooth’s history, not its current cover. If the tooth needed intervention, the pattern behind it had already done its work. The porcelain didn’t sign a peace treaty on your behalf.
What actually happens in a free diagnostic?
One hour, online, in English. We take one problematic tooth of yours and walk the pattern behind it: the figure, the lever, the repeating situations. You verify every claim against your own life, out loud or silently. No payment details, no obligation, no follow-up pressure. If the pattern doesn’t hold — you’ve spent an hour and it cost the hypothesis a data point.
My family was fine. Nobody hit me. Can this still be about me?
You look for harm where you were taught to: shouting, a belt, a slammed door. But there's a quieter mechanism — when a child is stripped of the right to witness their own life: "you're imagining it," "don't make things up," "we don't discuss that." Nobody raises a voice; it all comes wrapped in care. What comes out the other end is an adult who carries their own perception to others for approval. A warm, intact family and wrecked teeth coexist easily. The checklist measures the mechanics — not the family photo.
What happens to my data?
The self-check on this page stores nothing and sends nothing — scoring happens in your browser. In diagnostics and research, nothing individual is ever published without explicit written consent; findings are used only as anonymized, aggregated observations.